Citizen Kane

Citizen Kane, Directed by Orson Welles and released in 1941 was, like said in my review about Bringing up baby, there was more to this movie than meets the eye. Although, with my predicament of not even being alive in the 1940’s, I am enjoying it 70 years later.

The Story more-less follows various news reporters trying to figure out what the last words of a News paper publisher Mr. Kane (“rosebud”) meant.  But there has been quite a dispute over this subject. How could have anyone known that Mr. Kane uttered “rosebud” when no one was in the in the room when he passed away? Sounds like a possible film Easter egg? The movie is not in chronological order either because each man interview by the press had their separate story of Mr. Kane. SPOILER! When I finally saw rosebud in the movie (on his sled) it makes me think that he wished he could have started over. I got the impression that he wanted to go back to the day when he got adopted and stay with his true family. Who knows?

Mr. Kane had many rough edges and questionable traits. He had the passion to collect literally everything, mainly statues. He apparently wanted everyone to love him, but never acted like it. He was well aware he could have anyone and everything he wanted. He seemed more selfish and submissive than loving that he’s employees said he was.  

To be honest, there was no structured acting in this film. With actors changing with every “mini” story of Mr. Kane, no one is developed minus Mr. Kane himself. Sadly, this made the story a little gray in this area. But it wasn’t about character development so I understand its stand point.

To conclude, would I recommend anyone to watch this film? I think I might if this sort of film interested them. Otherwise no.

Pros: Creative film, Makes you think and not just watch

Cons: At times hard to follow, slow

Bottom Line: I like the idea of making the viewer think not just watch. You may enjoy it after you’ve thought about it a little and given it some time.

4/5 Stars

Review by Shane Sullivan